Cisco World Wide Training

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Module 2 - Design the Network Structure

Section 2 - Provision Hardware and Media for the LAN

Section Objectives

Upon completion of this section, you will be able to:

Time Required to Complete This Section

Approximately 2 hours

Completing This Section

Follow these steps to complete this section:

Resources Required to Complete This Section

To complete this section, you will need:

Reading Assignment

Switching versus Routing in Network Design

When provisioning internetworking devices for small- to medium-sized networks, you need to decide when LAN switches are appropriate and when routers are appropriate.

In general, incorporating switches in small- to medium-sized network designs will provide you the following advantages:

If you need internetworking services, routers are needed. Routers offer the following services:

Switching Services

Some services are becoming available on switches also. For example, support for multimedia often requires a protocol such as the Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) that allows workstations to join a group that receives multimedia multicast packets. Cisco now allows Catalyst switches to participate in this process by using the Cisco Group Management Protocol (CGMP). One router will still be needed, but you will not need a router in every department of a company because with CGMP switches can communicate with the router to determine if any users attached to them are part of a multicast group.

Switching and bridging sometimes result in non optimal routing of packets because every packet must go through the root bridge of the spanning tree. When routers are used, the routing of packets can be controlled and designed for optimal paths. Cisco supports improved routing and redundancy in switched environments by allowing one instance of the spanning tree per VLAN.

Scalability for Flat Networks

There is an upper limit to the size that flat switched/bridged networks can reach before broadcast radiation overwhelms the CPUs of the hosts. The limits are shown in the following table. These numbers are provided as a guide, based on the number of workstations on a LAN or VLAN. Actual workstation limits depend on factors such as:  
Scalability Constraints for Flat (Switched/Bridged) Networks 
Protocol
Maximum Number of Workstations 
IP 500
IPX 300
AppleTalk 200
NetBIOS 200
Mixed 200
 

When connecting LANs or VLANs via one or more routers, you need to understand the characteristics of the network traffic. It is also important to understand the performance of the router(s) you plan to use in the network design. We will talk more about router performance and capacity in the next section, "Provision Hardware and Media for the WAN."

Campus LAN Design

Campus LANs are easiest to design when the traffic obeys the 80/20 rule, which states that 80 percent of traffic is local to a LAN or VLAN and only 20 percent of the traffic goes to a different LAN or VLAN. This is the case when users primarily access departmental servers and the LANs or VLANs are subdivided by department. However, with the emergence of server farms and corporate Web servers, the 80/20 rule does not always apply. In these cases, it is important to provision bandwidth and routers carefully to avoid congestion and poor performance.
 

Cisco Switches

Cisco's Catalyst family is a comprehensive line of high-performance switches designed to help users easily migrate from traditional shared LANs to fully switched networks. The Cisco Catalyst family includes many products, such as: Refer to the "Small and Medium Business Solution Guide" that came with this course for information about the complete Cisco Catalyst family for small- and medium-sized businesses.

The following diagram shows a sample switched campus network using Catalyst 5000 series switches.
 

 

Provisioning Switches, Routers, Access Servers, and Other Cisco Hardware

When provisioning Cisco hardware, use the following documents to gather information on ports, interfaces, slots, memory, processors, power supplies, prices, and so on.

Provisioning Network Media

Before doing the case study, review the following table that you can use when provisioning networks:

 
Scalability Constraints for IEEE 802.3 
 
10Base5
10Base2 
10BaseT
100BaseT 
Topology Bus Bus  Star Star
Maximum Segment Length (meters) 500  185 100 from hub to station  100 from hub to station
Maximum Number of Attachments per Segment  100 30 2 (hub and station or hub-hub)  2 (hub and station or hub-hub)
Maximum Collision Domain 2500 meters of 5 segments and 4 repeaters; only 3 segments can be populated  2500 meters of 5 segments and 4 repeaters; only 3 segments can be populated  2500 meters of 5 segments and 4 repeaters; only 3 segments can be populated  See the Ethernet Design Rules Section that follows
 

Scalability Constraints for 10-Mbps Fiber Ethernet Networks

The following table provides some guidelines to help you choose the right media for your network designs.
 
Scalability Constraints for 10-Mbps Fiber Ethernet 
 
10BaseFP
10BaseFB 
10BaseFL
Old FOIRL 
New FOIRL
Topology Passive star  Backbone or repeater fiber system Link  Link Link or star
Allows DTE (end-node) Connections? Yes No No No Yes
Maximum Segment Length (meters) 500  2000 1000 or 2000 1000  1000
Allows Cascaded Repeaters? No  Yes No No  Yes
Maximum Collision Domains in Meters 2500 2500 2500  2500 2500
 

10BaseF is based on the FOIRL specification, which includes 10BaseFP, 10BaseFB, 10BaseFL, and a revised FOIRL standard. The new FOIRL allows DTE (end-node) connections, rather than just repeaters, as allowed with the older FOIRL specification.

Details on 100-Mbps Ethernet Topologies

Understanding Collision Domains

The overriding design rule for 100-Mbps Ethernet networks is that the round-trip collision delay must not exceed 512bit times. However, the bit time on a 100-Mbps Ethernet network is 0.01 microseconds as opposed to 0.1 microseconds on a 10-Mbps Ethernet network. Therefore the maximum round-trip delay for a 100-Mbps Ethernet network is 5.12 microseconds as opposed to the more lenient 51.2 microseconds in a 10-Mbps Ethernet network.

For a 100-Mbps Ethernet to work, you must impose distance limitations, based on the type of repeaters used.

100BaseT Repeaters

The IEEE 100BaseT specification defines two types of repeaters: The following table shows the maximum size of collision domains, depending on the type of repeater:
 
Maximum Number of Collision Domains for 100BaseT 
 
Copper
Mixed Copper and Multimode Fiber 
Multimode Fiber
DTE-DTE (or Switch-Switch) 100 meters 
--
412 meters (2000 if full duplex) 
One Class I Repeater 200 meters  260 meters 272 meters
One Class II Repeater 200 meters  308 meters 320 meters
Two Class II Repeaters 205 meters  216 meters 228 meters
 
 

Example of 100BaseT Topology

Other topologies are possible as long as the round-trip propagation delay does not exceed 5.12 microseconds (512 bit times.) When the delay does exceed 5.12 microseconds, the network experiences illegal (late) collisions and CRC errors.

Checking the Propagation Delay

To determine if other configurations than the standard ones shown will work, use the following information from the IEEE 802.3u specification.

To check a path to make sure the path delay value (PDV) does not exceed 512 bit times, add up the following delays:

Use the following steps to calculate the PDV:

     1. Determine the delay for each link segment (link segment delay value, or LSDV), including interrepeater
         links, using the following formula. (Multiply by two so that it is a round-trip delay.)

     
     2. Add together the LSDVs for all segments in the path.

     3. Determine the delay for each repeater in the path. If model-specific data is not available from the
         manufacturer, determine the class of repeater (I or II).
 
     4. MII cables for 100BaseT should not exceed 0.5 meters each in length. When evaluating system topology,
         MII cable lengths need not be accounted for separately. Delays attributable to the MII are incorporated
         into DTE and repeater delays.

     5. Use the DTE delay value shown in the following table unless your equipment manufacturer defines a
         different value.
 
     6. Decide on an appropriate safety margin from 0 to 5 bit times. Five bit times is a safe value.
 
     7. Insert the values obtained in the calculations described in the following formula for calculating the PDV:

      8. If the PDV is less than 512, the path is qualified in terms of worst-case delay.

Round-Trip Delay

The following table shows round-trip delay in bit times for standard cables and maximum round-trip delay in bit times for DTEs, repeaters, and maximum-length cables. (The values shown have been multiplied by two to provide a round-trip delay. If you use these numbers, you need not multiply by two again in the LSDV formula shown.)
 
Network Component Delays 
Component
Round-Trip Delay in Bit Times per Meter 
Maximum Round-Trip Delay in Bit Times 
Two TX/FX DTEs -- 100 
Two T4 DTEs -- 138 
One T4 DTE and one TX/FX DTE -- 127
Category 3 cable segment 1.14 114 (100 meters)
Category 4 cable segment 1.14 114 (100 meters)
Category 5 cable segment 1.112  111.2 (100 meters)
STP cable segment 1.112 111.2 (100 meters)
Fiber-optic cable segment 1.0  412 (412 meters)
Class I repeater -- 140 
Class II repeater with all ports TX or FX -- 92
Class II repeater with any port T4 -- 67
Source: IEEE 802.3u - 1995, "Media Access Control (MAC) Parameters, Physical Layer, Medium Attachment Units, and Repeater for 100 Mb/s Operation, Type 100BASE-T."

Example Network Cabling Implementation

Refer to the following graphic for this example. Company ABC has all UTP Category 5 cabling. Two Class II repeaters are separated by 20 meters, instead of the standard 5 meters. The network administrators are trying to determine whether this configuration will work.
 

To ensure that the PDV does not exceed 512 bit times, calculate a worst-case scenario using DTE 1 and DTE 2, which are 75 meters from their repeaters.

Assume that DTE 1 starts transmitting a minimum-sized frame of 64 bytes (512 bits). DTE 2 just barely misses hearing DTE 1's transmission and starts transmitting also. The collision happens on the far-right side of the network and must traverse back to DTE. These events must occur within 512 bit times. If they take any longer than 512 bit times, then DTE 1 will have stopped sending when it learns about the collision and will not know that its frame was damaged by the collision. To calculate the link delays for the Category 5 cable segments, the repeaters, and DTEs, we will use the values from the previous table titled "Network Component Delays." (The "Network Component Delays" table uses round-trip delay values, so you need not multiply by two.)

To test whether this network will work, we filled in the following table:
 
Delay Cause
Calculation 
Total
Link 1 75 x 1.112 83.4 
Link 2 75 x 1.112 83.4 
Interrepeater link 20 x 1.112  22.24
Repeater A 92 92 
Repeater B 92 92 
DTE 1 and 2 100 100 
Safety margin 5
GRAND TOTAL Add individual totals  478.04
 

The grand total is fewer than 512 bit times, so this network will work.

Calculating Cable Delays

Some cable manufacturers specify propagation delays relative to the speed of light (c) or in nanoseconds per meter (ns/m). To convert to bit times per meter (BT/m), use the following table:
 
Conversion for Cable Delays 
Speed Relative to c ns/m  BT/m
0.4 8.34 0.834 
0.5 6.67 0.667 
0.51 6.54 0.654 
0.52 6.41 0.641 
0.53 6.29 0.629 
0.54 6.18 0.618 
0.55 6.06 0.606 
0.56 5.96 0.596 
0.57 5.85 0.585 
0.58 5.75 0.575 
0.5852 5.70 0.570 
0.59 5.65 0.565 
0.6 5.56 0.556 
0.61 5.47 0.547 
0.62 5.38 0.538 
0.63 5.29 0.529 
0.64 5.21 0.521 
0.65 5.13 0.513 
0.654 5.10 0.510 
0.66 5.05 0.505 
0.666 5.01 0.501 
0.67 4.98 0.498 
0.68 4.91 0.491 
0.69 4.83 0.483 
0.7 4.77 0.477 
0.8 4.17 0.417 
0.9 3.71 0.371 
Source: IEEE 802.3u - 1995, "Media Access Control (MAC) Parameters, Physical Layer, Medium Attachment Units, and Repeater for 100 Mb/s Operation, Type 100BASE-T."

Scalability for Token Ring Networks

The following table lists some scalability concerns when designing Token Ring segments. Refer to IBM's Token Ring planning guides for more information on the maximum segment sizes and maximum diameter of a network.
 
Scalability Constraints for Token Ring 
 
IBM Token Ring
IEEE 802.5
Topology Star Not specified 
Maximum Segment Length (meters) Depends on type of cable, number of MAUs, and so on Depends on type of cable, number of MAUs, and so on
Maximum Number of Attachments per Segment  260 for STP, 72 for UTP 250 
Maximum Network Diameter Depends on type of cable, number of MAUs, and so on Depends on type of cable, number of MAUs, and so on
 

Scalability Constraints for FDDI Networks

FDDI does not actually specify the maximum segment length or network diameter. It specifies the amount of allowed power loss, which works out to the approximate distances shown in the following table.
 
Scalability Constraints for FDDI 
 
Multimode Fiber
Single-Mode Fiber
UTP 
Topology Dual ring, tree of concentrators, and others  Dual ring, tree of concentrators, and others  Star
Maximum Segment Length 2 km between stations  60 km between stations 100 meters from hub to station 
Maximum Number of Attachments per Segment  1000 (500 dual-attached stations) 1000 (500 dual-attached stations)  2 (hub and station or hub-hub)
Maximum Network Diameter 200 km  200 km 200 km

Case Studies

In this section, you will provision media and products for the LANs in the case studies.

Read each case study and complete the questions that follow. Keep in mind that there are potentially several correct answers to each question.

When you complete each question, you can refer to the solutions provided by our internetworking experts. The case studies and solutions will help prepare you for the Sylvan exam following the course.

In this section, you will review the following case studies:


Case Study: CareTaker Publications

Remember CareTaker Publications? If not, click here to review the case study.

Refer to the topology drawing you created for CareTaker Publications in the previous section. In this section, you will provision LAN hardware and media for CareTaker Publications.

Mr. Smith has indicated that the IS budget has been reduced to provide funding for another project. Mr. Smith wants to complete the project correctly, but needs to lower the costs.
 
     1. What media would you select between the switch and the servers?


      2. What media would you select between the switch and each of the eight network segments in the new
          CareTaker building?


      3. What switch would you recommend for the headquarters office? Complete the following steps to answer
           this question:



     
Now that you have completed the exercise, click here to view the solutions provided by our internetworking design experts.


Case Study: PH Network Services Corporation

Remember PH Network Services Corporation? If not, click here to review the case study.

Refer to the topology drawing you created for Mr. Pero in the previous section. In this section, you will provision LAN hardware and media for PH Network.
 
     1. What media would you select between the switch and the servers?


      2. What media would you select between the switch and each of the network segments in the main office?


     3. What LAN switch would you select? Complete the following steps to answer this question:


 
Now that you have completed the exercise, click here to view the solutions provided by our internetworking design experts.


Case Study: Pretty Paper Ltd.

Remember Pretty Paper Ltd.? If not, click here to review the case study.

Refer to the topology drawing you created for Pretty Paper in the previous section. In this section we will provision LAN hardware and media for Pretty Paper.
 
     1. What media would you select between the switch and the servers?



     
     2. What media would you select between the switch and each of the network segments in the new
         Pretty Paper headquarters building?



     
     3. What recommendations would you make for media between the switch and central manufacturing in
         the Pretty Paper design? What about the connection to the warehouse?


     4. Which LAN switch would you select? Complete the following steps to answer this question:



     
Now that you have completed the exercise, click here to view the solutions provided by our internetworking design experts.


Case Study: Jones, Jones, & Jones

Remember Jones, Jones, & Jones? If not, click here to review the case study.

Refer to the topology drawing you created for Mr. Jones in the previous section. In this section we will provision LAN hardware and media for Jones, Jones, & Jones.
 
     1. What media would you select between the switch and the servers?



     
     2. What media would you select between the switch and each of the network segments in the law firm's
         U.S. offices?



     
      3. What LAN media would you select for the international offices?


      4. What LAN switch would you recommend? Complete the following steps to answer this question:


Now that you have completed the exercise, click here to view the solutions provided by our internetworking design experts.


If you are finished with this section, click here to go on to Section 3 and provision the WAN media.


Copyright Cisco Systems, Inc. -- Version 2.0 7/98